[By Berihu Hagos]
Tigray is not a transient nation. It is built upon a robust ethical and moral foundation. Throughout its millennia of history, it has endured some of the most significant adversities. It is prudent to disregard the unfounded assertions of certain historians and politicians attempting to revise history to diminish the achievements of the Tigray people. It is not an extraordinary claim to state that Tigray is exceptional in its longevity as a nation. Tigray is a literate civilization characterized by well-established ethical standards of individual responsibility.
Tigray is undergoing a profoundly challenging and pivotal period in its history. As the wounds of conflict persist unhealed, internal divisions have exacerbated the crisis, diminished collective resolve, and jeopardized the future well-being of its people. The ongoing fragmentation not only amplifies humanitarian suffering but also erodes the foundations essential to achieving peace, stability, and self-preservation.
Among the most urgent and unresolved issues is the question of territorial integrity, which stands at the heart of Tigray’s survival. Without unity of purpose and leadership, the ability to restore and protect its lands remains severely compromised. Territorial integrity is not a secondary concern; it is central to the safe return of displaced populations, the restoration of dignity, and the long-term security of the region.
This challenge is exacerbated by additional urgent issues requiring immediate resolution, including the delayed repatriation of internally displaced persons, unstable security conditions, inadequate governance structures, and the incomplete implementation of peace agreements. Internal political conflicts and competing centers of authority have further worsened these conditions, eroded public trust, and diminished Tigray’s reputation both domestically and internationally.
However, this moment of crisis can still be turned into an opportunity for course correction.
First, Tigrayan leadership across the political, military, and civic spheres must urgently recenter on the fundamental priorities of the people: unity, dignity, survival, and stability. This includes a firm, unified commitment to addressing territorial integrity alongside humanitarian and governance challenges.
Second, an inclusive and transparent dialogue must be initiated without delay. All stakeholders must engage in good faith, not to assert dominance, but to forge a shared path forward. Elders, civil society, and credible community figures should play a key role in rebuilding trust and fostering reconciliation.
Third, clarity in governance is essential. The separation of military and civilian roles must be respected to ensure accountability, the rule of law, and effective administration.
Fourth, Tigray must present a unified and coherent position in its external engagements. A fragmented voice weakens its ability to advocate for its rights, secure its territories, and ensure the full implementation of the Pretoria peace agreement.
Ultimately, this moment calls for moral courage, humility, and responsible leadership. The choices made now will determine whether Tigray emerges with strengthened unity and purpose or continues down a path of fragmentation and vulnerability.
Tigray is at a crossroad. Unity, territorial integrity, and the well-being of the people must stand above all else. Without addressing these core issues together, the risks are too great to ignore.
I find your article and most of its arguments rational and engaging, as one would in any well-thought-out, coherent discussion of politics and territorial integrity. Anyway, the generations of Tegrawot since Meles have yet to produce charismatic, innovative leaders who can match the TPLF’s larger-than-life personality to address our serious political and economic issues.